Saturday, February 20, 2021

What product do you keep for way too long?

What product do you keep for way too long? How often do you  ACTUALLY replace certain household items?

According to the Lords of Internet, these following items should be replaced a lot more frequently than usually is practice.



Toothbrush?  Every 3 - 4 months. 

Me? When I drop it behind the toilet.

Refrigerator: 15 years

Me? I don't use one. Eat only fresh foods. (Fast foods)

Sponges: 2 weeks

They're so gross man.

Spices? Every six months.

To me this sounds like propaganda from the McCormick people. I know people who have 30 years worth of spices in their kitchen.



Tuesday, December 29, 2020

What is the all-time best Morrissey B-side? #SaveUsMorrissey

Thursday, September 03, 2020

Treatise on why you're wrong about Morrissey

If you think all of the negative press towards the oft-controversial Morrissey is new for the woke 2000s, Handsome Devil proves that the anti-Morrissey press has been dogging him his entire career. Some might make the argument that Morrissey goads the press is deliberately contrary, too pushy, too passionate, but even if any of those things are true, he is also been under a microscope from the British tabloid press since day one. As reported in The Sun by Nick Ferrari, The Conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens (1931-95), partially responsible for the Satanic scare of the 1980s, claimed the lyrics to Handsome Devil was about child molestation. Of course they aren’t. Morrissey quipped back in the September 3 1983 issue of New Musical Express, "This piece makes me out to be a proud child-molester and I don't even like children. Handsome Devil is entirely directed towards adults." Some controversy can be good but child molestation is not a stigma anyone wants to be burdened with. Later that month Morrissey told NME: “it's quite laughable coming from a newspaper like The Sun - which is so obviously obsessed with every aspect of sex. So it's all really a total travesty of human nature that it's thrown at us.” Yet even in the 2020s, Morrissey’s feud with the tabloids continues to this day. If you think Morrissey Is racist, the lyrics to Irish Blood English Heart would like a word with you. Here’s just a few headlines from the late 2010s:


Mozza Backs Tommy: Morrissey Attacks ‘Shocking Treatment’ Of Tommy Robinson And Loss Of Free Speech In UK In Latest Bizarre Interview The Sun June 6 2018

'I Always Thought You Were A D***  Morrissey Blasted For Manchester Bombing Rant The Sun May 25 2017

Morrissey's Hit Show Morrissey Punched In The Face  As Concertgoers Stormed The Stage During His Us Gig The Sun November 11 2018

The Light Has Gone Out – It’s Time We Stopped Giving Morrissey Attention The Independent October 31, 2019

The Smiths’ “Meat Is Murder” Is Nauseating To Vegetarians And Carnivores Alike The AV Club January 28 2015 

Morrissey Says Something Predictably Dumb About the Manchester Bombing SPIN May 23 2017

Morrissey Has Some Stupid Shit To Say About Sexual Assault And More. The AV Club November 17 2018

Morrissey Issues Bizarre Rambling Statement: 

“Because This is Who I Am” Consequences of Sound May 24 2019

Morrissey Is Anti-Immigrant...Why Don’t Fans Care? 

The Los Angeles Times October 24th 2019

Why Morrissey’s Downfall Echoes The Messy Demise Of The Smiths The Independent March 16th 2020

The most obviously biased stories are released when there is nothing else of consequence to report on. There was a recent article posted by myriad news sites calling Morrissey a ‘cunt.’ The source of the story was a drunk yelling on an iPhone video during a Morrissey concert. One drunk guy. They all made a story out of it too, including manufacturing what the guy was yelling about. It’s blind hate from the site editors that would allow a story like that to be posted. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. Articles calling Morrissey a ‘twat’ were so last year. It is the blatant return and embrace of yellow journalism.


Probably the most offensive bits are the way these authors write. They speak with such authority and in such moral superiority, yet write things like he “has some stupid shit to say.” It’s the opposite of Groupthink, it’s called wrongthink. It’s when you go against the officially decided cultural more of whichever particular day this is. So that’s ten recent articles from 2015-2020. I purposefully didn’t include some of the very hateful accusations and just pure frothing by journalists whose only job it seems is to make everybody hate everybody. By not labeling himself, he has been issued just about every label you can think of by the self-hating or self-righteous press.


Well, to paraphrase Bobby Dylan, not everyone has a lot of food but they have a lot of knives and a lot of forks and they gotta cut something. But if you need to ask Google (or Jeeves or whoever) if it is okay for you to like a band or musician, you need to reassess your values. If you can’t make up your mind without getting a community consensus then you don’t have any opinions worth having. If you need an excuse to like what you like, then do you really like it and who are you really? We don’t need to have a national consensus on what has value. Sometimes going against group values has value itself. Or as filmmaker John Waters told GQ in 2020 “it’s rich kids’ schools who are the most stringent police of it. I never understood what a trigger warning was I thought you went to college to have your values challenged. I thought that was the point of education.” There are some values that certainly we should all be able to agree on that should be societal values. Liking a band is not one of them. Art should always have l’air d’adversaire. Like Johnny Lydon (PiL, Sex Pistols) said to Spin in 2012 “I think as a species we’re a wonderful creation and I will be no man or woman’s cannon fodder plain and simple. I attack institutions for the benefit of all of us and to hell with the consequences, ’cause I mean no harm.” He told the Guardian in 2018 “I didn’t want to be a comfortable Mick Jagger-type naughty pop star”—a sentiment Morrissey shared with Rotten in his Viva Hate era b-side Get Off The Stage.


In August 2020, Australian music-maker Nick Cave said that “cancel culture” is a “bad religion run amuck.” He said that it is having an “asphyxiating effect on the creative soul of a society.” Monty Python co-founder John Cleese agreed with John Waters and Nick Cave in September 2020. He told BBC4 that pandering to the “most easily offended” will lead to a self-doubting and “neurotic” society. He said, “From the point of creativity, if you have to keep thinking which words you can use and which you can’t, then that will stifle creativity..” It is like when you take a lyric someone writes and then assume that lyric represents their world view. He said, “The main thing is to realise that words depend on their context. Very literal-minded people think a word is a word but it isn’t.” Furthermore, he said, “PC people simply don’t understand this business about context because they tend to be very literal-minded. The most bizarre thing is when people take lyrics and assume that these are ideals that Morrissey espouses. Nobody thought Billie Holiday was pro-lynching when she sang about the gallant south m and strange fruit hanging from the poplar trees. She was describing a scenario that existed, not embracing it. When Cobain sang Rape Me or Polly, he wasn’t endorsing rape. To continue to handpick and quote from a few lyrics as proof that Morrissey is racist is intellectually dishonest. As is decrying him because he supports causes that are in-line with his views on the treatment of animals or condemns those whose don’t. It is virtue-signaling by an uninformed or non-critically thinking populace.


In a thoughtful piece on The Post Millennial from July 15 2020, writer Fiona Dodwell said that people who say Morrissey lacks humanity do not consider how much humanity it takes to fight for animal rights. She brought up his activism, his stance against violent police persecution and the racist business. She was reminded of a 2019 art exhibition at the Elham Art Gallery called “To Morrissey With Love.” Hakim Ali Elhaj one of the even organizers said “We have been following with concern and shock the unjustified hate campaigns from media towards Morrissey for being honest and outspoken accusing him of racism fascism and hate and other non-sense...As a response from us at the gallery we decided to stand by Morrissey as his Muslim friends to acknowledge we are aware of him as a true and passionate friend and to tell the world we know he's not our enemy or hater and dedicate a group exhibition to him as a thanks for being brave in this cruel world.“ Dowdell pulled no punches with her indictment of the press and culture: “One wonders whether the vocal Morrissey detractors have delved much beyond the surface of NME's clickbait headlines and the lefty identity politics of formerly reputable publications like The Guardian.”


Morrissey has not really been contradictory in his views. He’s always believed in animal rights, LBGTQ rights, human rights, women’s rights and compassion. If anything, it’s his absolute commitment to these beliefs that a lot of people hated him in the first place and a new generation hasn’t grown much. Look inside and consider whether you would hold up to the same kind of scrutiny that you put others under and, if you still disagree with someone try to, do it with love rather then rhetoric and blurbs.


Even his political speech is usually couched in speaking about humanity. Let’s not forget when asked in 2017 by Der Spiegel: “If there was a button here and if you pressed on it Trump would die dead would you push it or not?” Morrissey responded “I would for the safety of humanity. It has nothing to do with my personal opinion of his face or his family but in the interest of humanity I would push.” Furthermore he said “he grabs after everything like a little child. He is not a leader. He is a vermin." In a statement on Fakeblock, Morrissey further clarified his position to Der Spiegel. He wrote, "A few weeks ago, I foolishly allowed Germany's Der Spiegel into my life. Since they eagerly flew from Berlin to beloved Los Angeles in order to talk and laugh, I assumed a common understanding. Would I kill Donald Trump? No, never. Would I support Kevin Spacey's private proclivities? No, never. Would I ever support abuse of children? No, never. Would I support sexual harrasssment? No, never. Would I support rape? No, never. Would Der Speigel convey my views fairly? No, never. Would I ever again speak to print media? No, never.”


It’s not unique to Morrissey that a poison press seems to be gunning for the outspoken artist. It’s very reminiscent of a young Bob Dylan who learned early in his career not to tell the press the truth. Rather, he’d let the songs speak for themselves all the while maintaining a fantasy of Who is Bob Dylan? Like Morrissey, Dylan eventually swore off print media. He has had few interviews since his Gospel years. He’s weathered the barbs of the press and reemerged in his twilight years as a man that can almost do no wrong. Yet, the many controversial comments, lyrics and ideas that Dylan has professed over the course of his 60 year career are not mentioned


This Is Not Your Country is a stark and aching opus that stands over seven minutes long, just after Late Night, Maudlin Street I on the list of longest Morrissey songs. It doesn’t feel particularly long, and it owes a lot of that to the tempo of the song. It’s pacing and storytelling is produced in such a way that one detail easily flows into the next. The arrangement is mainly two acoustic guitars panned to left and right, piano, keys and strings. The music matches the tone of the lyrics—dramatic and desperate.


Morrissey wrote the song about The Troubles in Northern Ireland, with which those of us in the US probably aren’t that well versed in what is going on it that part of the world. It just doesn’t get reported here. But by the sound of This Is Not Your Country, it’s not reported with regularity in the UK either. The lyrics seem to say that news networks like the BBC would rather just ignore it. Therefore, this song, based surely only on the title, has been used again to call Morrissey a racist. It’s the same people who say that “he sang England is for the English and used to always drape himself in the Union Jack!” that have adopted this idea.


Regardless of what you think of his views, stated or unstated, the world is becoming more intolerant of free speech. Even free political speech, which is supposed to be one of the protected classes of speech will see one on the receiving end of a ban or an old-fashioned Twitter canceling. In 2019, there was one person that was upset that he saw a Morrissey poster in a subway station. So this cat, according to the Liverpool Echo, called and complained and Merseyrail removed the posters that were part of a paid advertising campaign. The dude who complained told the Echo, "[The things Morrissey has said] offend me and a lot of other people. It's just strange to think Merseyrail, being a public service for the people, is advertising someone with his views. It's just pictures of Morrissey with his new album. He's not doing anything inappropriate, but his name is a by-name for questionable views at the moment..” 


The Echo wrote that hundreds of people were outraged by the posters removal. Here’s a few responses to the Echo story from their followup. "If it really was just one person offended, and the instant response then Merseyrail have really opened the floodgates now. Talk about spineless!" Another reader said, “the poster is advertising his album what’s that got to do with his views on any other subject? If people’s political views and distasteful behavior or comments were considered reason to remove them from public sight there wouldn’t be many left." Most of the published responses mention that they’re not even Morrissey fans. So, it’s not like it was all his fans coming to his defense.


 And like This Is Not Your Country has been labeled as “proof the he is racist,” a lot of what he has said is purposefully manipulated and confused. Nowhere in the article did the dude state what Morrissey said that supposedly offended him. I can tell you, I’ve worked in the media for 15 years and the number of complaints that have accurately been able to recall what they’re angry about is zero. It’s always “I didn’t hear it but I heard about it” or “I wasn’t listening the whole time.” These people will call your supervisors, your advertisers and be incredulous over something that never happened. It was either a construct of their own psyche or something that was completely misheard or misrepresented. We’re going to have to face it, if you disagree with the prevailing mood, you better not say anything, because rather than working for change, people are working to silence.


In 1996, Morrissey told Alan Coor of Raidió Teilifís Éireann, “I've never been one to pay attention to what anyone else thinks. I do my own thing because it suits me well. I don't think I'm mellowing out in any way whatsoever. There are things that I write about that mean a lot to me that may not concern other people.” I guess at this point you have to ignore it. Either way, This Is Not Your Country. Vulture named it one of Morrissey’s Top-20 Unheralded Songs. In 2014, Vulture wrote, “This Is Not My Country is another entry on this list that has come under scrutiny for its perceived racially inflammatory sentiments." 


Then there's the idea that Morrissey has said he greatly dislikes Pakistanis. This comes from an unauthorized biography written by known Morrissey enemy Johnny Rogan. And even then it's an unsourced third-hand story from Morrissey would have been a teenager.  Let us look at his support for so-called Far-Right politician Anne Marie Waters. Many of her views would be considered radically Left-wing in America. She's an animal welfare advocate who supports the ending of stunned and religious slaughter. Their Web site says, "Religious slaughter, both halal and kosher, involve cutting the throat of a conscious animal; a practice prohibited under British law (which requires animals to be stunned to unconsciousness prior to slaughter). EU laws provide a religious exemption to this.  For Britain will repeal this exemption in the UK and demand that British law is obeyed.." She's been a life-long LGBTQ advocate. She's a feminist and an agnostic who is the director of the National Secular Society. She later told ITV she opposed "racism, antisemitism, misogyny and the oppression usually associated with the far right". Sometimes political support has to go to the less of evils and those views have certainly line up with Morrissey's long-held views on equality, inclusion and animal rights. In fact, many of the "controversial" things Morrissey has said in recent years have to do with ending animal cruelty. He called the boiling of cats alive barbaric and evil, but the press reports that he hates Asians. No, he hates the people that torture and abuse animals. Same message since 1984 and it seems he thinks that just because you are of a particular nationality or religion doesn't mean you get a free pass on boiling cats.


In a ridiculous piece of reporting in 2014, The Daily Express wrote, "Madness stars still angry over Morrissey gig walkout." Madness stars Graham 'Suggs' Mcpherson and Chris Foreman are still annoyed singer Morrissey walked out of their 1992 reunion shows because the incident cast a shadow over the band's comeback." They're still annoyed 22 years later? Who thought to ask them that? The very old story happened on August 8, 1992. It goes that Morrissey was asked to play at the Madness comeback concert Madstock! While Morrissey and Th'Lads were on stage, rowdy fans began to throw all manner of things on stage. Although, fan footage of the show doesn't reveal the "constant barrage" that was reported at the time. The crowd is very vocal, however. But there is a good amount of support and applause after each song. I'll tell you what, though, I wouldn't have messed with those guys. Gary Day and Boz look like they could end you. This is the infamous show where Morrissey draped himself in a Union Jack flag that someone threw on stage. He did sort of stick it in his pants though during the performance of Glamorous Glue. Imagine such a thing being controversial in the US. As an American, I have to admit, I don’t understand all the fuss. I saw a picture from the 90s where Phil Collin, the guitarist from Def Leppard, was holding his trademark Union Jack guitar. Oasis used Union Jack imagery a few years later. Why is it okay for them? Morrissey told Q in 1996, “I didn't invent the Union Jack, you do realise that, don't you? I didn't knock it up on a spinning wheel in the front room. I can't account for people's reactions. Some people adore it; others are embarrassed by it. I don't get it. I don't understand the fascist implications of it. I think it happened because it was time to get old Mozzer. Nothing more sophisticated than that.” He told The Big Picture in 1997, "I can't imagine why anybody would want to be racist." He said. "It's so beyond me I feel unqualified to talk about it. So many people have used the Union Jack since then, with the eruption of Britpop. Nobody else has been pilloried for it.”


Morrissey says that he tries not to pay this kind of reporting any mind. He told Fiona Dodwell, for her piece This Is Morrissey in 2018, “I often have no idea what people are writing about. I don't recognize myself in their criticisms. They live in a world of their own, and they won't break away from what each other says on any subject. You long for a reviewer who steps away from the pack. I don't think I've done an interview with the UK music press since 2007, which isn't snobbery, but I simply became tired of the ridiculous BIGMOUTH STRIKES AGAIN headlines ... my voice is very soft and quiet, in fact, and it doesn't strike again, or even strike at all.”


*Just as a point of fact, NME issued an apology to Morrissey In June of 2012: “We wish to make clear that we do not believe that he is a racist; we didn’t think we were saying he was and we apologise to Morrissey if he or anyone else misunderstood our piece in that way. We never set out to upset Morrissey and we hope we can both get back to doing what we do best.”


Saturday, July 25, 2020

Gatekeeping Folk Music

First of all, I love traditional music. I love folk music, sea songs, celtic harp music, almost anything in the public domain. I'm a researcher and compiler of these songs. I will say, however, that I haven't found the "folk music community" to be welcoming. There have been some outside the US who have been friendly, but here... not so much.
They said they were starting a new local folk music show on the college station. So, I wrote an email to the host and welcomed her. She asked me to send her some of my folk music. I did. I sent her 200 songs. I never heard from her again. Her local folk music show is chocked full of Arlo Guhrie, Keith Richards and other well known local Delaware artists like these.
I heard a cat on NPR this morning who is a folk singer. The feature was about how this guy gatekeeps folk music. "If I hear someone on the fiddle playing Turkey in the Straw, I go up to them and tell them to stop." He said that because the song has a complicated history, that much later on someone put racist lyrics to it, so now the song has been cancelled. No more Turkey in the Straw. He said that even it's only on fiddle with no lyrics, he'd force them to stop playing it. It's hurtful, he said. 
This cat goes to folk festivals and holds lectures about the racist history of certain songs. This whole speil was broadcast on the same station that still plays Wagner on their classical music programming.
An article on the Library of Congree web site explains the songs roots: The racist associations of the tune are only part of its legacy, though, and are neither the oldest part nor the most recent. The tune has roots in much older music, and has continued in forms largely devoid of racial connotations. The origins of “Turkey in the Straw” hearken back to British and Irish dance music. In her 1939 book Folk Songs of Old New England, Eloise Hubbard Linscott (whose collection of recordings and photographs is part of the AFC archive) identified “Turkey in the Straw” as a variant of the British tune “The Rose Tree,” which is also related to the Irish piece “The Rose Tree in Full Bearing.” You can hear a cylinder recording of William Nathan “Jinky” Wells playing “The Rose Tree” in the player below, from the James Madison Carpenter Collection. The recording is AFC 1972/001 Cylinder 110."

So, here's a very very old tune, that when played on the fiddle is an instrumental that we should never play or stop playing because it was played at minstrel shows 100 years later. Does that sound reasonable to you? I, like many musicians, never knew the words. I never even saw the words until I got a book called "The Best Loved Songs of the American People" twenty years ago. I knew it from cartoons, mostly. Mickey Mouse whistled it. It was in Bugs Bunny cartoons. When I started researching celtic music, like the music of blind harpist Turlough O'Carolan, (1670 – 25 March 1738), I discovered that MANY of the songs in the 1960s came directly from Irish melodies. Most of Bob Dylan's early acoustic albums are well-known folk tunes that he put knew words to. Woody Guthrie did the same thing, although sometimes in reverse. He'd put new music to old words. It's complicated and nowhere near as easy as "that song is hurtful, don't play it." I also question whether it is actually hurtful if you have to hold a seminar to explain to people why it is hurtful. I had close to 250 folk songs, and folk music I performed with my band, that I have removed from sale. All of them. My album of 40 Sea Shanties had songs by Stephen Foster. Foster's music was used in minstrel shows. Therefore, Foster must be cancelled. I've never a big fan of hold people of the past to the standards of today, I know that's a hard thing to hear right now. But if we erase every peice of art done by somebody who is "problematic", what will be left? If we start at Turkey in the Straw, we have to call Dylan "problematic" he said the n-word in two songs. He became a Christian. Lennon said the n-word in one of his songs. He had a "problematic" history with the women in his life. Dr. Dre, Snoop, Ice-Cube they all degrade women in their music. That's problematic. The Hills by TheWeeknd talks about how he "fucked two bitches"—so.. women shouldn't be referred to that way. That's problematic. Actually, if you look at any art you're going to find the warts of the artist. Why? Because man is problematic. We lie and cheat and hate and kill and love and create beautiful things and create art that lasts 500 years. I named one of my albums after a British Admiral and was called racist and forced to change it. Not because the Admiral was racist but because his nick name was "Black" Richard. Like Black Beard. But, I was told it was racist so I did what I always do. I retreat back into sadness and feel pain for a confused world. SFX

Sunday, June 14, 2020

What Is Fake News?

We are in a new dark age of intellectual dishonesty where people seek out opinions they agree with rather than hard truths. I went to college for Communication, News writing and Broadcasting and journalistic integrity has always been of tantamount importance to me as anything when reporting a story. Some people don't know the difference between opinion and fact, sure. But, what's even more horrifying is the amount of people who get fake news from the deepest recesses of the Internet and share them multiple times with no backing or source information. I saw a woman post today a 4chan meme and present it as fact about Black Lives Matter. I saw another that I traced back to a Russian Troll Twitter account. If you don't know the source.. Ask yourself why?! Here're some rules I came up with to help you identify whether or not you are being misled.

#1 Take Care Before you hit Share.

Make sure this is a trusted site and the person that created the news item is properly identified. If it seems to outrageous or "too good" to be true. It probably is. If it's an image (like the rape victim you've been besmirching and claiming she was a victim of George Floyd) do a google image search or check out tineye.com and do a reverse image search. I'm the case of the rape victim, it took 35 seconds to identify the picture as a fake from a Spanish news article from 2018.

If you've never heard of a website or person reporting, you're not "digging deep" to "find the truth" you're looking for any narrative that will confirm your biases. You are scouring the Internet to confirm your conspiracy theories. Do you really think that you have this incredible ability to find "The truth" that others in your peer group don't have or are you just gullible? If you're so adept at "finding the truth" why can't you take 2 minutes to confirm the story by searching for corroborating evidence?

Does it make sense or does it incense?

I want you to vet your news sites. Fox news has been caught in the last 2 days doctoring images to make the Seattle occupation seem violent. If you think that 'only one news agency is telling the truth" do you maybe think the reason for that is they're the ones doing is misleading? OANN has been caught interviewing people with fake names, making up details and one of OAN's reporters, Kristian Brunovich Rouz, simultaneously works for the Russian propaganda outlet and news agency Sputnik, which is state-owned; when Rouz runs favorable segments on OAN that relate to Russia, OAN does not disclose that he also works for Sputnik. Where are you really getting your information? The Kremlin?

For God's sakes, check your dates.

This is an easy one. Check the date and byline of the story you are sharing. If there is no date or byline, why? If it's unsourced, why? If it's 'something you found by digging', why is it not a bigger story if its true? Many stories and images are published from years ago with false details and fake pictures. The story about George Floyd "pointing a gun at a pregnant woman" not only is her name made up in those stories, there's never been any information that she was pregnant, but this forwards your racist brute caricature for African American men 'coming for your women' this has been being used for hundreds of years to dehumanize African Americans and your unwittingly forwarding this bias that is so deeply ingrained in culture that you don't even realize you buy into it. Fox News posted an image from the May 30 Minneapolis protest and said it happened a few days ago in Seattle. Why? Because the truth wasn't juicy enough. A bunch of hippies hanging out bbqing vegan burgers isn't scary enough.

Take note, who wrote?

Is this story anonymous? Is it from a private website? Is it from Facebook or Twitter? What is the source? If there is no author or the author is a random Facebook page, why are you allowing them to control your narrative? Who are they? I mentioned before the BLM post I debunked. When I found the author, it came from a 4Chan uses that was trying to troll and trick people. Chain of evidence. It went from 4Chan, to a probably Russian troll on Twitter, then shared by these 'deep digging Conservative "news" sites' then you shared it. A lot of these fake posts are complicit in inciting violence and should be held accountable for the equivalent of shouting FIRE in a crowded theater.

Is it contradiction or Fiction?

The Fox news pic of the man with an assault weapon at the Seattle protest that was doctored comes to mind. If what the story is saying contradicts their views, what is the purpose of the story? For example, they gleefully showed armed anti-maskers at the state capitol, yet they show an armed protester at the Seattle protests and its something to fear. It's obvious that the agenda is clear. Us against Them where truth doesn't matter. To make matters worse, the Seattle protest was photoshopped and Fox lied about it twice. How can you trust a news source when this is how they behave? How do you excuse that? Because it's comfortable for you. But news isn't supposed to make you feel comfortable or at peace. It's supposed to be information. What you do with it is up to you.

At last, Is it in all caps?

is the post IN ALL CAPITALS? This is one surefire sign that the person posting is either unhinged or trying to incite. All CAPS is the internet version of yelling. Why do you YELL everything you say? Why can't you have a conversation without getting red-faced angry?


Saturday, June 13, 2020

Fascism

For you geniuses that don't know the definition of words you use. This is how you identify a Fascist regime. There are 14 key traits by Lawerence Britt of Free Inquiry Magazine and author of the book "Fascism Anyone?" https://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/fasci14chars.html Powerful and Continuing Nationalism Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause Supremacy of the Military Rampant Sexism: The governments of fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy. Controlled Mass Media Obsession with National Security Religion and Government are Intertwined Corporate Power is Protected Labor Power is Suppressed Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts Obsession with Crime and Punishment Rampant Cronyism and Corruption Fraudulent Elections Hitler was a fascist. I really worry that some of you don't actually know anything about history. This is from a Smithsonian article from 2019 Nazism is a form of fascism, with disdain for liberal democracy and the parliamentary system. It incorporates fervent antisemitism, anti-communism, scientific racism, and the use of eugenics into its creed. Attached is a picture of the fine Woody Guthrie who wrote many anti-hitler songs in the 1940s. Guthrie was also for worker's rights and ending racism. He played with African American musicians on the regular when it was very unpopular to do so.

Thursday, June 11, 2020

Spotlighting Baby Bear Cubs

 Proverbs 12:10 The righteous care for the needs of their animals,
but the kindest acts of the wicked are cruel.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4tDyhmJ6N8Q

"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated" _Gandhi

The question I would raise is.. why? Why do you want to kill baby bears? What good does it serve? Where is your compassion for other living things? If it only serves as 'fun' for you or because you think it's your right to kill anything you want to, what does that say about you?
Gandhi is right on this one, see how the agendas and ideals merge on these posts? You're for police violece, you're anti-protester. You conservatives but anti-conservation, You're pro-1st amendment but the people who are protesting are 'domestic terrorists', You care so much about laws and rules, but damn near lose it when you're told to wear masks to protect others at the grocery store. You support those anrti-maskers protesting, but if it's protesting for equal rights for all you start sweating facism. You worry about idolatry yet If anybody dare mentions that police are human and not universal heros, you can't handle it.

they only thing that you can agree on, whether it be black women or bears asleep in their homes, you want them to be shot.

We do have an epidemic besides Covid in this country. An epidemic of Pride and self-worship, By trying to hang onto little and outdated shards of the past, with this silly idea that "things were better back when I was a boy." They weren't. Not for everyone.

The Kardashev scale is a method of measuring a civilization's level of technological advancement that was proposed by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev in 1964. Scientists say that it would be very rare for a society to move from a class 1 to a class 2 society.

Many scientists don't think we'll ever reach the next class/type of civilization because we're too keen on killing each other. Until the needless killing for pleasure or erections stops, we're doomed. But what do you care? You're on the back 9 of your lives anyway.

Well, You're leaving a shit-show for your brainwashed kids.

Where is your compassion? "a sympathetic pity and concern for suffering." Why do you care so little for the suffering of others, man or beast?

If you don't have to kill, why do it? For sport. Shooting fish in a barrel isn't sport, it's lack of humanity. Gross.

And don't tell me it's about your rights. You don't care about the rights of others. You applaud when the president's henchmen lob tear gas and flash grenades at peaceful protesters so that he can have a photo-op at a nearby church without having to see the rabble. You don't care about human rights, civil rights or the first amendment. Is it hard to live such a conflicted life or do you get comfort from your rallies, peer groups and prayer groups? You're so tough on the outside but so fragile on the inside. What happened to you?>

Hate is no longer the majority opinion

Supporting racists and victimization by law enforcement is no longer the majority opinion.
I'm ashamed that I've worked at places that have, by turning a blind eye, supported this kind of behavior or outright endorsed it. I do not respect you. And i'm embarrassed by you.
Think on this, friends, people are being fired from their jobs for ignoring the truth and peddling false narratives (either in an attempt to kowtow to bigots in their audience/customer base, afraid or retribution or because they themselves hold these views.)
It's cowardice at best and endorsement at worst.
And let me add, if you're afraid of retribution... then perhaps the reason people are protesting is a just cause. And if you're afraid you'll lose the support of bigots, then what does that make you?
Think on it and search your heart.
They say the tide is turning, but I doubt it is. As soon as you return to your realm of comfort, things'll will go back to the status quo. But maybe, little by little, the erosion of outdated hateful views maybe expose the people for what they are. Scared.